#49 – Cost predictability, events customers, employees, partners and communities should worry about
Welcome to the 49th edition of my customer strategy newsletter. The five topics this week are:
Predictability of costs can be more important than how high they are
My car is coming up to five years old, and it came with a five-year warranty that included all the regular services, free of charge. The garage approached me with a proposal for an extended service contract that has almost the same attributes as the OEM warranty. I plan to sign it, as soon as the contract arrives in the mail. Yet, my car has been totally reliable, and not one single thing has gone wrong since it was new. So, why do I think it is worth quite a lot of money to me to sign a 24-month contract?
A bit of personal automotive background may be relevant. Every car I have owned before my present one has had some sort of breakdown. My first few cars were extremely unreliable. (A Lancia Fulvia, a Citroen GS, a Matra Bagheera, if you must know.) I have been through Ford and Mercury models in the UK, and a variety of German and Japanese cars, including a Lexus. Perfection has eluded me up to now, but now I seem to have it, at least from a reliability perspective.
I have been accustomed to having substantial unpredictable automotive costs. The part that upsets me is not so much the expense as its unpredictability. With my new contract, my expense will be quite high (about $2800 for two years), but totally predictable.
I believe this rationale applies to a lot of businesses too, and to a much greater extent. Budgets are prepared annually. Unpredictable expenses have to be minimal. This means you can charge customers far more for an annual contract than their average costs would have been without the contract. Sure, you may lose money on one or two contracts that have bad luck and high expenses, but you will win out overall. Predictable costs, even if they are relatively high, are much better than the alternative for both customers and companies.
Here are two nasty events customers, employees, resellers and communities should probably worry about
I live not very far from the corporate headquarters of the Nestlé company. They are going through a period where they have the ‘pleasure’ of a substantial activist investor. The consequences for everyone except shareholders seem pretty negative, and feature frequently in local newspapers and the TV news. This got me thinking…
Companies that do good things for customers, employees, suppliers, partners such as resellers, and for local communities tend to have CEOs that have come from the inside and a business strategy that is quite consistent over time. Consistent can mean constant evolution and adoption of new technologies too, for example. They tend not to have sudden, major change. Sometimes major change happens when a new CEO is appointed from the outside, and sometimes there are other reasons. (In a recent Freakonomics podcast about CEOs, they discussed new research that confirms older research: CEOs from outside, on average, perform significantly worse than insiders, and cost an average of $3 million more annually.) Anyway, CEO changes may cause some major events to occur, and there may be other causes.
I believe there are two types of events that should make alarm bells go off for employees and customers. And I suppose suppliers and the local communities should be worried too. These events are:
I have worked full-time on M&A for a number of years, and have formal training in the area. I am not making this up. Elimination of duplication seems to pass the laugh test, but in practice, I have never seen a deep discussion about the work the people have been doing, and where that work will now happen. The absence of such discussion is partly due to regulatory requirements to discuss layoffs with workers councils in some countries before details can be discussed with employees.
I say the duplication argument seems to pass the ‘laugh test’, but I don’t generally believe it, because of what I have seen when there are substantial divestments. Logically, when two companies are split up, the opposite of what happened when they were joined together should now take place. It never does. When two companies are joined together, the story includes lines like ‘We have two HQ staffs and need only one.’ Seems logical. When companies are split up, you would think the plan would including hiring a lot of people, since work now needs to be duplicated. However, such plans generally have the opposite, meaning major layoffs. ‘We have split our business up into two independent businesses, which will each be run by their current business unit staff. We will lay off all of the HQ staff.’ The laughing stops then.
While activists are active, and while major M&A work is happening, very little that is good for employees, customers, suppliers, resellers and communities is happening. Employees who are not in charge of the change projects should be preparing their CVs /resumes. Customers, suppliers and other stakeholders should be hedging their best. Shareholders can plan on making nice returns, in the short term.
As always, feel free to disagree…
Our latest blog posts
Here are the latest posts. Older posts are still available on the blog page.
Notable customer experience items from other sites
Bruce Temkin: The Future of VoC – Insight & Action, Not Feedback
Some of you may have received a request from Temkin Group for feedback on the state of your Voice of the Customer programs. The results are now out on the Customer Experience Matters website, and they are worth a read. His words about insight and action platforms are particularly useful. I note that ‘three-quarters of companies rate their VoC programs as successful’. I remember reading somewhere else that customer views on this are not as optimistic. You can read it here.
Net Promoter System website: NPS program self-assessment
Speaking of assessing the current state of customer experience programs, here is a way to do so on your own if you use the Net Promoter System. You will be taken through a short series of questions that cover the main elements of NPS. The result is a ‘traffic light’ assessment of your progress, meaning a red / amber / green light for each area. Take the free assessment here.
I am happy to report that February is already a new record sales month, surpassing January’s record. Thank you. Both months have featured what may be managers making purchases of specific books for their teams, as far as I can tell. I believe having a team read and discuss the same book is particularly important when they have to work together on something new that is included in the book. The reason is that the team gains a common understanding of the words and methodologies described in the book, reducing confusion.
Here are links to all of the books on Amazon.com. Kindle versions are available in all stores. Print versions are available from the major stores only, with the notable exception of Australia, where print versions are not available from amazon.com.au.
“So Happy Here”: The Absurdist but Essential Guide to Better Business (Black & White edition)
Please share this newsletter with your friends and colleagues and encourage them to sign up for it here. I have put links to past newsletters on the subscription page. Finally, please feel free to change or cancel your subscription using the link below.
You can also email me, Maurice FitzGerald, at firstname.lastname@example.org.